Interest Rates

What Happens To Gold Price If The Fed Doesn’t Cut Rates?

by

GOLD PRICE IF THE FED DOESN’T CUT

With the increasing gold price of late comes the assumption that the expected cut in interest rates will open a torrent of cheap money that will bring the U.S. dollar down with a thud.  But, what would happen to the gold price if the Fed doesn’t cut interest rates?

What seemed like a universally expected event may not be as likely as some have assumed. In fact, the Fed has a history that includes examples of pivots and re-pivots; or, ignoring the presumed pivot and staying the course.
You can read more about the possibility that the Fed might not cut interest rates in my article Investors Are Too Anxious For Rate Cuts.

In this article we will address the implications for gold if the Fed doesn’t cut interest rates. It matters not what the reasoning is behind such a possibility. What matters is that much of what has happened to prices for gold, stocks, bonds, etc., is based on the presumption that several interest rate cuts are forthcoming, possibly before the end of the year. Hence, there is a potential shock for investors who have relied on that presumption, as well as the particular logic mentioned in our opening paragraph above, should the Fed not follow through.

IMPLICATIONS AND POSSIBILITIES

Ignoring for now the finer (and more critical) point of inflation-adjusted returns, both gold and stocks are at all-time highs. What might happen to gold if a “potential shock” becomes a reality? It depends.

To the extent that a more significant portion of money used to fund the purchase of gold recently was done so based on the presumed cuts in interest rates and a clear change in direction, then we could see a significant decline in the gold price; at least temporarily. This might also happen if interest rate cuts are delayed. Market participants in both stocks and gold would likely see any inaction or hesitancy by the Fed regarding interest rate cuts as negative for their investment outcomes and expectations.

Another possibility is that any effects on the gold price could be muted. That has more to do with other factors, not interest rates. For example, if the prevailing thoughts dominant in the minds of those placing a larger portion of the money flowing into gold is not based on concern about interest rates, rather on anything else, then it is entirely possible that the gold price might show little reaction to non-cuts in interest rates.

OTHER FACTORS, SUMMARY

Some buyers in the gold market are not thinking so much about interest rates. Their concerns have more to do with the continual loss of purchasing power in the U.S. dollar. The erosion of U.S. dollar purchasing power is the result of ongoing inflation, which is the intentional debasement of money by governments and central banks. The continuous expansion of the supply of money and credit for more than a century has resulted in a dollar which has lost ninety-nine percent of its purchasing power.

Over time the gold price is historically correlated to that decline in the purchasing power of the dollar. Gold is real money and a long-term store of value.

Whether buyers of gold are individuals (retail investors), speculators, hedge funds, governments, or central banks; and whatever the reasoning behind their purchases, which reasoning is quite often temporary; in the end, it is still all about the U.S. dollar. (also see U.S. Dollar Best Of The Worst; Gold Best Of The Best)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED!

Investors Are Too Anxious For Rate Cuts

by

INVESTORS ARE TOO ANXIOUS FOR RATE CUTS

Anxious investors seem to be expecting more than has been “promised” regarding interest rate cuts. Some (quite a few) seem overconfident that the long awaited pivot is a done deal. In addition, anticipated results from the expected cuts are already built into the markets to a large degree. Here are some thoughts worthy of consideration…

1) Suppose the Fed cuts rates later this year, but not as much as expected. Is cutting interest rates 1/4 or 1/2 percent all that is necessary to kick the gravy train into high gear?

2) Is a Fed pivot a temporary thing? Maybe the Fed cuts a quarter point once or twice, then re-pivots and begins raising rates anew.

3) What if the Fed doesn’t cut rates at all?

ANTICIPATION IS MAKING ME WAIT

(Thank you, Carly Simon, for the perfect subheading.) The possibility of three rate cuts in 2024 has been amplified to mean that the Fed will cut rates this year – 2024. The rate cuts most everyone is expecting are the same rate cuts that were assumed and expected for most of last year – 2023. Isn’t it possible that rate cuts could be postponed again? How long can elevated stock prices and other assets maintain their lofty levels based on the expectation of lower interest rates which continue to be expected but not realized?

IF THE FED PIVOTS, MIGHT IT BE TEMPORARY? 

Overlooked in the rush by everyone outside of the Federal Reserve to talk interest rates down are comments by Fed Chair Powell which include the phrase “higher for longer”. Those who are so intent on expecting lower interest rates might do well to consider not just the possibility, but the likelihood of rates remaining higher for longer. 

Rates were intentionally forced lower by the Federal Reserve over nearly four decades prior to the official announcement their campaign to raise interest rates in March 2022. During those four decades the Fed moved back and forth both higher and lower regarding interest rates, but all changes in direction were temporary within a long-term decline in rates lasting nearly forty years.

The emphasis on “lower for longer” took interest rates close to zero and created an addiction for cheap money and credit. The artificially low interest rates that fueled the addiction were not normal. They were abnormally low historically and created huge bubbles in asset prices. Financial and economic volatility increased and the U.S. dollar suffered a loss of credibility and purchasing power.

As a result, the Fed was forced to change its interest rate policy to protect and defend the dollar. Not out of a patriotic sense of duty, but in order to save the financial system. It may be too late for that.

That brings us to our final point. What if the Fed doesn’t cut interest rates?

WHAT IF THE FED DOESN’T CUT RATES?

It is very much a possibility that the Fed might not cut rates at all. The inclination to do so seems to change from week-to-week and month-to-month along with changing economic data and statistics. Jerome Powell has been consistent in his comments that “higher for longer” is the game plan. Maybe rates get kept at current levels for awhile longer.

At their current level, interest rates are still abnormally low on a historic basis. Historically normal interest rates average 7-8 percent. We are not there yet. And with the extreme lows for interest rates experienced for several decades, there is a significant amount of inefficient allocation of money and resources that needs to be reallocated. That will result in varying degrees of financial and economic pain.

CONCLUSION 

The Federal Reserve has a history of market intervention and manipulation. The Fed’s interest rate policy is a manipulation ‘tool’. The market intervention and manipulation is ongoing. The overriding purpose is to create and sustain an environment that enables banks to continue to lend money and collect interest in perpetuity.

Often, though, application of the ‘tool’ is a defensive reaction to unintended and unexpected financial and economic events. For many years now, the Fed has been occupied with battling the negative consequences of it previous policies and actions. They may be in the driver’s seat, but the vehicle is out of control.

Stormy seas are ahead. If the Fed cuts too soon or too much, the cheap bubble juice will create more inefficiencies and extreme volatility. Right now, just the expectation of a return to cheap and easy money/credit has blown bubbles in almost everything priced in dollars. At some point, bubbles get popped. That is something the Fed is trying to avoid.

Interest rate cuts are not a sure thing. Investors could be in for a nasty surprise. (also see Federal Reserve and Market Risk)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED!

Two Reasons The Fed Manipulates Interest Rates

by

There are two reasons the Fed manipulates interest rates. Before we talk about those reasons, though, it is important to understand that the Fed does not actually control interest rates. Interest rates are set in the bond market. Buyers and sellers (traders) bid for and offer bonds for sale. When a buyer and seller agree on a price, the trade is finalized. The specific price, in conjunction with the face value of the bond (always $1000) and the stated coupon rate attached to the bond (and the length of time until the bond matures for yield to maturity) factor into the formula which determines the current yield, or what might be called the bond’s current interest rate.

In addition, the Fed does not set the fed funds rate. The fed funds rate is the rate which member banks (banks which belong to the Federal Reserve system) pay to borrow money from each other in an overnight market. What the Fed does is announce their “target range” for fed funds.  The Fed hopes that member banks will limit their lending activity with each other to the publicly announced target range.

The Fed has direct control over only one specific interest rate – the discount rate. The discount rate is the rate which member banks pay to borrow money directly from the Federal Reserve. The specific rate which the Fed charges to member banks at its “discount window” can and does influence trading in the fed funds market.

The extent of the Fed’s influence is limited mostly to short-term rates, such as those above. Since they do not actually control interest rates, particularly long-term rates, how do they influence trading activity in the bond markets? They talk a lot. This should be obvious to most observers. A more critical factor, though, is the Fed’s active participation in the bond market, buying and selling huge amounts of U. S. Treasury securities (and CMOs more recently).

TWO REASONS THE FED MANIPULATES INTEREST RATES

The history of the Federal Reserve is a history of interest rate manipulation. Specific interest rate policy of the Fed, and subsequent compliance (go along to get along) in the credit markets, resulted in a trend of lower interest rates dating back nearly four decades. The trend began in the 1980s and continued until just a couple of years ago. Unfortunately, the collateral damage from “cheap and easy money (credit)” led to crisis conditions in the credit and foreign exchange markets.

The specter of inflation seemed ready to overwhelm the markets and the economy; and, as they have done in the past, the Fed reversed direction on interest rates. Rightly so, some would say; except that the Fed has been playing the same game since its inception in 1913 – and they have a losing record. (see Fed Interest Rate Policy – 2008, 1929, And Now). So, why does the Fed continue to play a game they keep losing?

There are two specific reasons. The first is because it is in their own self-interest.

The Federal Reserve is a private institution. It is a banker’s bank. The Fed provides an environment which allows banks to create money in perpetuity and collect interest ad infinitum.

Fed manipulation of interest rates is a misguided effort to extend and control the prosperity phase of the economic cycle. Over the past century, the effects of inflation created by the Federal Reserve has increased the volatility and frequency of financial catastrophe and economic dislocation. Hence, the Fed spends most of its time putting out fires. This, of course, conflicts with and limits the Fed and member banks abilities to grow their lending capacity and income stream from the interest they collect on their “funny money”.

The second reason for ongoing Fed manipulation of interest rates is related to the first reason; and, it involves the U.S. government.

Before the Federal Reserve was authorized by Congress, representatives of the cabal of bankers and politicians that were trying to get specific legislation through Congress and to the President’s desk for signature met with some highly placed government officials. At that meeting, a promise was made that guaranteed the U. S. government would always have the funds it wanted – if the bill passed which authorized the origin and operation (private) of the Federal Reserve. The legislation passed.

When you hear politicians today, or at any time, complain about the Federal Reserve, you can be relatively certain that any attempts by Congress to thwart the Federal Reserve and its operations won’t get very far. Bite off the hand that feeds you? Kill the golden goose? I think not.

The Federal Reserve is very happy with the arrangement, too. Biggest source of income to the Federal Reserve? Interest on U.S. government securities. That is not a coincidence. It is the perfect example of a win-win situation. (see US Government is Beholden To The Fed And Vice-Versa)

CAUTION FOR INVESTORS 

The reason the Fed began its attempt to raise interest rates is because they were at a juncture where continued easing could again trigger huge declines in the dollar. On the other hand, rising interest rates increases the risk of potential implosion in the credit markets.
We said earlier that the Fed spends most of its time putting out fires. Federal Reserve activity for the past several years is based on fear. They are afraid of triggering a complete collapse in the U.S. dollar, yet they are also afraid that their efforts to restore interest rates to a more historically normal level will be rejected and the credit markets will collapse and usher in economic depression.
The irony is that they are trying to manage the effects of inflation that is of their own making. And doing a poor job of it.
With history as a guide (see The Fed’s Changing Game Plan) and allowing for the lack of Fed success over the decades, it seems that betting on a “Fed pivot” to trigger investment profits amid new bull markets holds more potential risk than reward. (also see Federal Reserve – Conspiracy Or Not?)

Bond Market Tells The Real Story

by

BOND MARKET TELLS REAL STORY

While everyone else twiddles their thumbs and waits for the next missive from the Federal Reserve, the bond market has spoken loudly and clearly about the near-term (and, possibly long-term) direction of interest rates.

Read more

Interest Rates Could Double/Treble Again

by

INTEREST RATES INCREASE

The steady increase in interest rates coupled with references to inflation has some people scratching their heads. Not surprising. The two don’t necessarily go together. For now, let’s see if we can add some perspective to interest rates.

Read more

Gold And US Treasuries – Punctures In The Everything-Bubble

by

GOLD AND US TREASURIES 

The price of gold early Friday morning this past week touched $1720. At that level it was down $350 per ounce from its high point of $2070 last August.

The size of the decline is not unusual at face value. But, in light of the expectations for hugely higher inflation rates and much higher gold prices that have dominated the headlines over the past year, the drop might signal a cause for concern among gold bulls.

Meanwhile, eyes are fixed on interest rates for US Treasury bonds. During the same six-month period (August 2020 – February 2021) during which the price of gold fell by seventeen percent, the price of the 20-year US Treasury bond fell by twenty percent. That IS a huge deal, as it corresponds to sharply higher interest rates from less than 1% last August to as high as 2.26% just the other day.

The rush to proclaim correlation between interest rates and gold has resumed. Also, warnings and predictions of much higher inflation from around the globe are increasing.

As we have said on several occasions, there is no correlation between gold and interest rates (see Gold And Interest Rates – There Is No Correlation).

This can be seen on the charts below. The first chart (source) is a history of gold prices over the past fifty-six years and the second chart (source) is a history of interest rates over the same time period…

GOLD PRICES 1965-2021

 

10 YEAR US TREASURY RATE 1965-2021

During the 1970s, the price of gold rose from $40 per ounce to an intraday peak of $850. All throughout that time, the interest rate on the 10-year US Treasury bond rose higher and higher; from approximately 4% to 12.5%.

However, during the years 2000-2011, while the price of gold rose from $250 to $1900, interest rates on the 10-year US Treasury bond dropped from 6% to 2%.

The two decade-long periods provide contradictory results for the argument that lower interest rates are correlated to higher gold prices.

And for those who argue that the higher rates we are currently seeing are an indication of significantly higher inflation, then why is the gold price declining?

The higher interest rates are possibly a market reaction to the brutal effects of infinite credit creation and interest rate manipulation by the Federal Reserve.

The entire world economy is funded with cheap credit and most economic activity is dependent on it.  The prices for all financial assets misrepresent and grossly exaggerate any underlying fundamental value.

Higher rates might trigger a credit collapse so severe that any asset could decline in price by fifty percent or more.

As for gold, it would also decline – to a level commensurate with whatever strength the US dollar attains.

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT  and  ALL HAIL THE FED!

A Lesson About Gold – How Bullish Can It Be?

by

A Lesson About Gold

Apparently, there is no limit. This seems especially true right now with all of the “obvious” signs and indicators staring you in the face. It is almost blasphemous to speak cautiously. Better to let your imagination run wild and join in the revelry.

I can’t do that. I don’t choose to be dumped into the same cauldron of boiling fantasy with other analysts and advisors, who tout and promote based on the latest headlines. There has to be more to it. I think there is.

Read more

Investors Act Like Spoiled Children

by

When a small child wants some candy or a treat, they usually ask for it. When they don’t get it, they might throw a temper tantrum. They might also throw a tantrum when they want more: more candy, more dessert, etc. 

Read more

Gold And Interest Rates – No Correlation

by

GOLD AND INTEREST RATES 2001-11

Over and over again, the following statement or something similar continues to find its way into commentary about gold:

“…prospects of higher US interest rates have the ability to limit upside gains. It must be kept in mind that Gold is a zero-yielding asset that tends to lose its allure in a high-interest rate environment”  

A variation of that statement:

“Because gold doesn’t bear interest, it struggles to compete when interest rates rise.” 

The statements imply a correlation between gold and interest rates. And the implied correlation suggests that higher interest rates result in lower gold prices.

If that is the case, then there should be some historical precedent to corroborate the correlation. There is. And we only need to go back a few years or more to find it. But it does not corroborate the correlation; it refutes it.

During the ten-year period 2001-2011, gold’s price increased from $275.00 per ounce to a high of nearly $1900.00 per ounce. And interest rates continued their long-term decline throughout that entire period.

In this example the original correlation is inferred to be supported by the opposite scenario  – lower interest rates and higher gold prices. So far, so good.

GOLD AND INTEREST RATES 1970-80

However, let’s go back a bit further along the time line. Between 1970 and 1980, the price of gold increased from $35.00 per ounce to $850.00 per ounce. But rather than declining, interest rates were on a tear.

Rather than “struggling to compete” gold was galloping ahead in the face of ever higher interest rates and increasing lack of demand for higher-yielding investments.

The higher rates were a reflection of lower prices for bonds and particularly U.S. Treasury securities. The 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yield exceeded 15%. Which makes you sort of wonder when you read something like this:

“Higher rates boost the value of the dollar by making U.S. assets more attractive to investors seeking yield.” 

Two ten-year periods of outsized gains in the price of gold. And interest rates were doing something exactly opposite during each period. There simply is no correlation between gold and interest rates.

Additionally, there is no correlation between gold and 1) social unrest, or 2) global terrorism; or 3) world wars. Gold is not a safe haven hedge and it is not an investment. It is real money.

WHY DOES GOLD PRICE CHANGE?

But is there something that correlates with gold? Anything at all? Why does its price change? And so dramatically, it seems?

With respect to gold and its price changes, there is only one thing that correlates. The U.S. dollar.

The U.S dollar is a substitute for gold. Gold is original money. The price of gold is an inverse reflection of the changing value of the U.S. dollar. The ongoing, never-ending deterioration of the dollar’s value means ever rising gold prices over time.

Gold is the standard; not the U.S. dollar. Gold has earned its designation as real money over five thousand years of history. It is original money. And it is real money because it is a store of value.

And there is historical evidence to support the correlation of gold’s price to the value of the U.S. dollar. Every change of significance in time and price for gold correlates with an inverse change in the value of the U.S. dollar. Higher prices for gold correlate with a lower value for the U.S. dollar. Lower gold prices correlate with stability and strength for the U.S. dollar.

The correlation between gold and the U.S. dollar is implicit. One does not ’cause’ the other. Either one is the inverse of the other.

Some have said that the argument about correlation of interest rates and gold depends on making a distinction between real interest rates and nominal interest rates. No correlation there, either.

That is because any patterns that appear to confirm correlation between real or nominal interest rates and gold need to include the U.S. dollar. The U.S. dollar is the determining correlative factor re: gold.

Without taking into account the relative strength or weakness of the U.S. dollar relative to gold’s price, any other correlations are either meaningless, misleading, or contradictory.

There are six major turning points (1920, 1934, 1971, 1980, 2001, 2011) on the chart (source) below. All of them coincided with – and reflect – inversely correlated turning points in the value of the U.S. dollar…

Gold Prices: 100-Year History
                                                                                               

The U.S. dollar is the world’s reserve currency and gold trades are settled in U.S. dollars. Since gold is priced in U.S. dollars and since the U.S. dollar is in a state of perpetual decline, the U.S. dollar price of gold will continue to rise over time.

There are ongoing subjective, changing valuations of the U.S. dollar from time-to-time and these changing valuations show up in the constantly fluctuating value of gold in U.S. dollars.  (read more here)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED!

Gold And Interest Rates – A Mass Of Confusion

by

Over the past several months there have been numerous articles referencing a relationship between gold and interest rates. Most of them are well-meaning attempts to convey information about recent changes in the markets as interest rates head higher.

In several instances, however, the author(s) have tried to explain a ‘perceived’ correlation between rising interest rates and the value of the US dollar – in a very positive manner. And they have imputed a similar correlation – albeit negative – in other statements with respect to Gold.  In both cases they are incorrect.  

Read more