Kelsey Williams

Is The Federal Reserve ‘Too Big To Fail’?

by

The term “too big to fail” refers to certain businesses whose viability is considered critical to the survival and effective operation of our economic system. These very large businesses are designated as too big to fail because their failure or bankruptcy would have disastrous consequences on the overall economy.

The potential effects are considered to be severe enough, and the costs so unbelievably large, that these businesses are afforded special attention and consideration in the form of bailouts and protection from creditors.

Read more

Fed Inflation Is Losing Its Intended Effect

by

FED INFLATION HAS LESS IMPACT

The chart below shows the ratio of the gold price to the monetary base for the past one hundred years.

The monetary base used in the chart is calculated by the St. Louis Federal Reserve and the following definition is from their website:

“The Adjusted Monetary Base is the sum of currency (including coin) in circulation outside Federal Reserve Banks and the U.S. Treasury, plus deposits held by depository institutions at Federal Reserve Banks. These data are adjusted for the effects of changes in statutory reserve requirements on the quantity of base money held by depositories.” (source)

Read more

Gold – US Dollar vs US Dollar Index

by

When it comes to analysis of gold, the U.S. Dollar Index finds nearly universal acceptance. Or rather, when most analysts refer to comparison/correlation of the U.S. dollar to gold, they usually illustrate their point with a chart of the U.S. dollar index.

While they won’t say it straight out, most of them see the U.S. Dollar Index as a proxy for the U.S. dollar. But, is it?

Read more

Peak Gold Not Bullish For Prices

by

PEAK GOLD NOT BULLISH…

For over a year now, the South African mining industry has experienced a measurably significant decline in the amount of gold produced.  Statistics reported by South Africa last week show that the amount of gold produced by South African mines has declined for fifteen consecutive months. In December, gold output dropped thirty-one percent from the year before.

All mines, including gold, have a useful life which is determined by the ‘extraction period’ – the period of time during which recovery of the desired mineral deposit is procured. The output over time tends to grow at first, reach a peak, and then decline. 

Read more

Gold Technical Perspective – Why So Bullish?

by

Does technical analysis need to be so convoluted?  Here are a couple of definitions from different sources:

1) Convoluted: (especially of an argument, story, or sentence) extremely complex and difficult to follow. (source)

2) Convoluted sentences, explanations, arguments, etc. are unreasonably long and difficult to understand.

We are not talking about the accuracy or relevancy; or even the general length of an article centered around charts and graphs. But the convolution of most technical analysis does provoke some head scratching.
Another concern might be the nearly universal use of extrapolation. 

1) Extrapolation: the action of estimating or concluding something by assuming that existing trends will continue or a current method will remain applicable.

2) Extrapolate: to infer or estimate by extending or projecting known information. 
Judicious use of extrapolation is warranted. However, the inference of trend continuation can lead to predictions and expectations of little foundation or merit.
In this article we will look at three charts (one-year, five-year, and ten-year) of GLD, the SPDR Gold Shares ETF. (source for all charts)
In order to emphasize simplicity and consistency, I have drawn only two lines on each chart – a rising uptrend line of support; and a descending overhead line of resistance. All three charts are updated as of Friday, February 15th, 2019.
Immediately below is the first chart, a one-year history of daily GLD prices…
From this chart we can see that GLD has worked its way higher since its recent low last August. And it appears that it soon may intersect/test overhead resistance at 126. If it does break through and move higher, most observers would probably think that doing so would signal much higher prices.
That seems reasonable, but how high? And what about the downside risk? If it doesn’t break through soon, it could fall back to its rising uptrend line of support. Currently, that is a drop of about eight percent to 114.
Is there enough upside potential to offset the downside risk by an acceptable margin?
While there is nothing overtly negative in the chart pattern, there is also nothing obviously positive, either; at least to a degree that would warrant excessive bullish optimism.
So, lets look at the next chart, a five-year weekly history of prices for GLD…
On this chart we see that there is a descending line of overhead resistance dating back to at
least February 2014.  And the rising uptrend line of support dates back to December 2015.
The longer time periods in both cases are indications of strength. This means that the overhead line of resistance we talked about before will probably not be broken too easily. And maybe not right away. It has turned back at least three previous attempts in the past three years.
But it also means that the uptrend in place for the past five years cannot be taken lightly, and could provide strong support on any pullback.
So where does that leave us? Is there sufficient technical justification to support wildly bullish claims for new highs in gold prices this year? Next year?
Our final chart just below is a ten-year history of monthly prices for GLD…
From this chart we get an entirely different perspective about gold prices. The rising line of support which has been in place for three years is seen within the context of declining line of overhead resistance which goes back almost six years.
In addition, it is apparent that the two lines will soon intersect; and that the price of GLD will eventually cross at least one of those lines. But which one?
If it is the line of overhead resistance, then that would seem to indicate that recent strength in the price of GLD is the foundation for considerably higher prices.
But the risk on the downside is still significant. Possibly much more than most recognize.
It took twenty-eight years for gold to finally surpass its 1980 price peak of $850.00 per ounce. We are now in the eighth year of declining prices for gold. Can you wait twenty more years to see $1900.00 gold again?
Why so bullish?  (also see Gold Under $1000 Is A Very Real Possibility)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED!

 

 

Are Gold Bulls Naively Optimistic?

by

Are gold bulls naively optimistic? They are certainly optimistic; at least as regards their expectation for higher gold prices. But is that all that is needed to make them happy?

If gold marches higher from here, does that signify that all is well?  Would the gurus and wanna-be millionaires be proven correct if gold were priced at $10,000.00 per ounce?

We could ask when. But if those who expect big things for gold are correct, then when might not matter. 

Read more

Fantasy Prices For Real Estate

by

(author note: If you have not read the original article (link below), I suggest you do so before reading this one)

From “How Much Is Your House Worth Today? Another Crisis Brewing?” …

"Maybe it is time to sell the ‘investment’. After all, it has been more than ten years since our investor broke ground on his personal gold mine. But, after speaking with the realtor, our investor is even more discouraged.

Apparently, a reasonable asking price is somewhere in the neighborhood of $690,000.00 – $700,000.00.  That is considerably less than the purchase price of $1.1 million. And it is also less than what is still owed – $850,000.00. Which means it will have to be a short sale – if the bank will agree.

After some negotiation, the bank agrees to a conditional listing at $749,900.00.

Exactly two months later, the asking price is reduced to $699,000.00. And a short two weeks after that, it is reduced again – to $649,000.00.

Ten long weeks later, an offer is tendered. The offered price is $550,000.00. It is quickly turned down by the bank. The listing is removed."

Now for an update. Five months after removing the listing, our investor decided to try again. The house was relisted in July 2018. The listing price of $749,900.00 was identical to the original listing price in August 2017. 

Read more

Need A Second Opinion?

by

DO YOU NEED A SECOND OPINION?

Let’s face it. No one plans financially for disaster. We assume that if we are conscientious, persistent, and long-term oriented, that our plans –  generally speaking – will find fruition.

We carry insurance to protect ourselves against financial loss from events such as death,  major illness, disability, property damage, long-term care, etc.

But what about systemic risk?

How will you survive a complete credit collapse and loss of 50-90 percent of the value of all assets denominated in U.S. dollars? What about a full-scale depression?

When most advisors talk about investing in such a way as to minimize risk and avoid market blowouts, there is an implicit assumption that whatever the situation, it will be temporary; that the financial markets will continue to function.

Maybe that isn’t the case. Wide-scale bankruptcies, bank failures, and interruptions in communication channels could effectively stop markets from functioning at all.

Suppose you have an investment that generates huge profits for you during a stock market collapse; say a short position on some individual stocks or an ETF with a similar strategy.

Because of the leverage involved, if a market decline is steep enough and swift enough, there may not be any traders or other investors with money to whom you can sell your profitable ETFs or from whom you can buy back your existing short positions.

What if the U.S. dollar renews its long-term decline in accelerated fashion? Is runaway inflation a possibility and how would you be affected?

Do you understand the concept of fractional-reserve banking and the danger it presents?

Maybe you don’t own stocks. You might own bonds which provide you with interest income. Or real estate; or gold. Extreme negative market conditions will affect all of these things in ways you probably cannot imagine.

If you are worried or concerned about any of  these things, or just feel the need to be better informed, you could benefit from a personal consultation.

Or, perhaps you are a corporate officer who has employees that would gain from a better understanding of these issues.

Whatever your particular situation, take action today. Send me an email with your concerns and questions. I will get back to you quickly.

Let’s talk…  kwilliams@kelseywilliamsgold.com

Bio: KelseyWilliams

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED!

 

Gold Price – US$700 Or US$7000?

by

Does either of the above preclude the other?  In other words, if we expect gold to reach $7000.00 per ounce, and we are correct, does that mean that we can’t reasonably expect gold to go as low as $700.00 per ounce? Conversely, if we are predicting or expecting gold to decline from its current level and even breach $1000.00 per ounce on the downside, can $7000.00 per ounce, or anything even remotely close to that number, be a reasonable possibility? 

Read more

Gold – Looking Back, Looking Ahead

by

GOLD – LOOKING BACK

Each year we are treated to calls for gold’s next big move. We heard it last year; and the year before, too. And the year before that. It may not be a broken record , but it is the same song.

Predictions for gold’s price are more than guesses, but they might as well be just guesses. That’s unfortunate, because no small amount of time is spent trying to analyze gold. And it is time wasted. 

Read more