Jerome Powell

What Powell Said And Why It Matters

by

WHAT POWELL SAID

“a marked slowing in both the supply of and demand for workers…suggests that downside risks to employment are rising. And if those risks materialize, they can do so quickly in the form of sharply higher layoffs and rising unemployment.” and “…the shifting balance of risks may warrant adjusting our policy stance,” Jerome Powell – Jackson Hole, WY 8/22/25

An AI summary of Powell’s remarks sans the emotion and frothiness of investors and others said that “Powell’s Jackson Hole remarks were carefully calibrated—not a firm commitment to cutting rates, but a clear signal of readiness to pivot if economic conditions warrant it. He recognized rising risks in the labor market and suggested that, given such risks and the Fed’s already restrictive stance, a policy adjustment might be justified. However, any change would be data-driven and cautious.”

WHY IT MATTERS 

Investors and the media interpreted those remarks as the signal that “the race is on”. Someone said that Powell’s remarks “opened the door to a possible interest rate cut”. 

Investors rushed through the door with complete abandon and drove stock prices up to new highs, seemingly oblivious to Powell’s expressed statements  that conditions “may warrant adjusting our policy stance” and “any change would be data-driven and conscious.”

The door was kicked open almost one year ago when the Federal Reserve announced its intention to lower the Fed funds target rate in September 2024. After two successive cuts, the target rate has remained unchanged.

Jerome Powell acknowledges the growing risks in the labor market and the presumed risk of higher inflation from tariffs. The labor market threat is real and appears to be significant. Hence, Powell’s comments that labor market risks can accelerate “quickly in the form of sharply higher layoffs and rising unemployment” are noteworthy.

Tariffs are not inflationary.

“Tariffs are taxes imposed by a government on imported goods. Tariffs are assessed at the port of entry and must be paid before the goods can be unloaded. Whoever (businesses, consumers, etc.) imports the goods pays the tariff(s) to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, a government agency. Subsequently, remittance is made to the U.S. Treasury. (see Tariffs Are NOT Inflationary)

The effects of tariffs compound the risks associated with the labor market. Any acceleration in layoffs and unemployment will be exacerbated by the effects of tariffs. The results could lead directly to deflation and economic depression.

CONCLUSION

The Fed dilemma pertaining to interest rate policy remains the same. Lower interest rates and aggressive monetary growth will slam the dollar. Higher rates and restrictive monetary policy will depress economic activity.

Holding rates stable seems the more prudent choice. If nothing else, a disastrous day of reckoning might be postponed.

Far from being a boon to growth (domestic or otherwise), the effects of tariffs will magnify and accelerate problems in the labor market and the economy. Those effects can overwhelm Fed efforts to stave off financial and economic collapse.

The worst that could happen is likely to come quickly. (also see Complete Financial Collapse Is Unavoidable)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED

Trump vs. Powell vs. Yellen – Same Game

by
Generated image

We have been here before. President Trump’s latest bashing of Fed Chair Powell isn’t without precedent. Chair Powell was the object of President Trump’s scorn during his first term, too.

It doesn’t stop there, though. Trump vs. Powell was preceded by Trump vs. Yellen.

During the 2016 campaign, Trump accused Yellen of keeping interest rates artificially low to benefit the Obama administration and predicted a market collapse once she raised rates. He claimed she was “keeping them artificially low to get Obama retired” and “she should be ashamed of herself.” (NBC News Nov 2016) 

One year later, towards the end of his first year in office, President Trump nominated Jerome Powell as the new Fed Chairman. Here is what I said then…

“President Trump nominated Jerome H. Powell as the new Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank. Don’t look for much to change. And Janet Yellen’s announcement that she will resign from the board upon Mr. Powell’s induction as board chair is pretty much a non-event.” (New Fed Chairman, Same Old Story Nov 2017)

That was almost eight years ago. Has anything changed? Ironically, in 2016, Trump was displeased with Fed Chair Yellen for “keeping rates artificially low”. Now, he is attacking Fed Chair Powell for not lowering rates more aggressively.

THEN AND NOW

Both Ms. Yellen and Chair Powell face(d) similar situations. Their terms as Fed Chair expire(d) before their terms as board members conclude. That would mean sticking around for a couple of years as a board member after their term as board Chair ends.

I believe Ms. Yellen, as Fed Chair, was very concerned about the prospect of presiding over a financial crisis that would tarnish her reputation as Fed Chair. Here is what I said seven months prior to Jerome Powell’s assumption as Fed Chair…

“…if Ms. Yellen makes it through the current year unscathed, she won’t be hanging around afterwards. She won’t want to extend her risk of being at the helm when the ship sinks.

And don’t trouble yourself worrying about who the next Fed chief will be.  It doesn’t matter. It is too late in the game for a quarterback change to have any meaningful impact.” (The Fed’s Dilemma July 2017)

CONCLUSION 

The situation today isn’t much different from eight years ago. Jerome Powell’s term as Federal Reserve Board Chair ends May 2026. I expect him to finish his term (ends May 2026) as Chairman and voluntarily resign from the board at that time without serving the remainder of his term (ends January 31, 2028) as a member of the board, just as Chair Yellen did, for similar reasons.

Can you imagine either Janet Yellen or Jerome Powell serving as a member of the board after their term as Fed Chair ended? (also see Cruisin’ Wtih The Fed and Federal Reserve –  Conspiracy Or Not?)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED

Federal Reserve Is A Private Institution – Powell Is Not A Public Servant

by

At his press conference earlier this week, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said the following… “The public should be confident that we will continue to do our work as we always have, focusing on using our tools to achieve our goals, and, really, keeping our heads down and doing our work,” he added. “That is how we best serve the public.” 

Powell’s repeated use of the personal pronoun “our” rates special attention. I don’t think he means it in the collective sense. In this case, “our” means them – not us. Admittedly, his appending claim “…how we best serve the public” is meant to allay fears and present himself and the Fed in a more positive light. Nevertheless, investors and others need to know and understand some things about the Federal Reserve’s origin and purpose.

From The Creature From Jekyll Island (G. Edward Griffin)…

“Back in 1910, Jekyll Island was completely privately owned by a small group of millionaires from New York. We’re talking about people such as J. P. Morgan, William Rockefeller and their associates. This was a social club and it was called “The Jekyll Island Club.” That was three years before the Federal Reserve Act was finally passed into law. It was November of that year when Senator Nelson Aldrich sent his private railroad car to the railroad station in New Jersey and there it was in readiness for the arrival of himself and six other men who were told to come under conditions of great secrecy. For quite a few years thereafter these men denied that any such meeting took place. It wasn’t until after the Federal Reserve System was firmly established that they then began to talk openly about their journey and what they accomplished. Several of them wrote books on the topic, one of them wrote a magazine article and they gave interviews to newspaper reporters so now it’s possible to go into the public record and document quite clearly and in detail what happened there.” 

PURPOSE OF THE FED 

The purpose of the Federal Reserve is to provide a structured system whereby its member banks can create and lend money in perpetuity. The Fed accomplishes this by continually expanding the supply of money and credit.

The Federal Reserve exists for the benefit of the banks and bankers.  Its purpose and motivation is not aligned with ours. The Fed’s objective is to facilitate the ongoing creation of money and loans which generate interest income. (see The Federal Reserve – Purpose And Motivation)

Our financial problems are the result of intentional inflation created by the Fed. Cheap and easy credit has exacerbated the fragility of the entire banking system.

Why in the world would the United States Congress approve a bill which authorized the inception of a private institution whose purpose and goals had nothing at all to do with serving the public? Besides, the government (President Andrew Jackson) had promised there would never be another National Bank. Here is why the Federal Reserve exists today…

COLLUSION AND SECRECY 

In order to allay the fears of the American public, and convince Congress that it was in the best interests of the country to authorize by law the existence of this ‘private’ institution, it was necessary to effect a campaign at two specific levels: grass roots, i.e., the American public; and, behind closed doors, i.e., politicians and the U.S. government.

The message delivered was that the mission of the Federal Reserve was to actively manage the stages of the economic cycle – recession, depression, recovery, prosperity – and, thus, avoid the extremities of panics and crashes that had plagued the banking industry and put depositors at continual risk. (This has morphed into a two-pronged goal of focusing on 1) maximum employment and 2) stable prices.)

The statement of intention to manage the stages of the economic cycle was born out of necessity. Members of Congress would not vote in favor of any bill authorizing existence of a central bank without their constituents approval. If the American public thought there were benefits that could outweigh their fears, and if enough members of Congress felt similarly, and perceived that public support was sufficient, then possibly the bill would pass.

Support of business and the general public notwithstanding, approval was not assured. In exchange for support by the government (Wilson administration including Treasury officials and others), another secret meeting was held at which an agreement was made that if the Federal Reserve was granted a legitimate birthright, all future government funding was assured.

In other words, the Federal Reserve underwrites and guarantees that the US Treasury/Government will get whatever funds it needs; a promise made over one hundred years ago. (see U.S. Government Is Beholden To The Fed & Vice-Versa)

PRIVATE INTERESTS VS PUBLIC POLICY 

So, what did the bankers get out of this? The answer is found in one word. Money.

More specifically, they got control over the money. They were now legally authorized to be everyone’s sugar daddy, and, ostensibly, they had the support of the United States government and its citizens.

Banks lend money to individuals, companies, and governments. They also lend money to countries, revolutionaries, and global conglomerates.

The Fed is not particularly interested in the profitability or welfare of  smaller, individual banks, though. It was intended originally that the Federal Reserve could better supervise and contain damages spawned by errant actions of independent banks, but the primary goal was to create an environment that would allows the banks, especially big, power center banks, to operate and function without interruption, and on a hugely, profitable scale.

With the inception of the Fed, the bankers could protect the interests of their elite hierarchy and retain control over the money supply, lending activities, funding their own special interest activities, and make tons of money doing it.

JEROME POWELL VS DONALD TRUMP

President Trump is now demanding (again) that the Fed lower interest rates. This is what Powell had to say about it…

“I am not going to have any response or comment whatsoever on what the President said,” Powell replied. “It is not appropriate for me to do so.”

Fed policy (and purpose) is not designed to support off the wall “demands” by politicians (or investors, for that matter). A similar “demand” was made during Trump’s first term. It went nowhere. Two years into his successor’s term in office, the Fed began raising rates; much to the chagrin of a majority of outspoken enthusiasts from both political parties.

The current difference of opinion between Mr. Powell and President Trump could be entertaining, though.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of claims to the contrary, the Federal Reserve does not exist to serve the public interest. The Federal Reserve is a banker’s bank which exists for the purpose of 1) creating and lending money and 2) collecting interest in perpetuity.

As valid as are the calls to end the Fed, it likely won’t happen. The United States government would lose its pipeline to unlimited funding. The result would be financial and economic pandemonium.

The road ahead, though, will bring financial and economic devastation anyway. Right now, the Fed has everything it can do to handle the unintended consequences of its own errant policies over the past century. Fighting the negative effects of more than one hundred years of intentional inflation is a full-time job. (see Federal Reserve – Conspiracy Or Not?)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED

Backtalk From The Bond Market

by

BACKTALK FROM THE BOND MARKET

Investors keep looking to the Fed for supposed “forward guidance”. They are looking in the wrong place. Since mid-December, bond prices have declined another 5% and are currently at new 52-week lows. Here is an updated chart of U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)…

U.S. Treasury bond prices have now declined 16% since the Fed announced a reversal in its interest rate policy and the first rate cut last September. The latest weakness comes in the face of a second rate cut, so it begs a repeat of the question I posed last October…
“Why are bond rates rising at the very time the Fed is trying to move interest rates lower?” (Fed Cuts Rates But Bond Rates Are RISING)
Subsequently, the Fed announced a second rate cut, but the announcement lacked the conviction that inflation is under control and that multiple rate cuts could be expected for 2025.
I don’t so much think the Fed has suddenly had a change of heart. The situation is precarious and the cumulative effects of more than full century of money creation (inflation), mis-management, and manipulation have evolved into a game of playing catch with a ticking time bomb.
Former Fed presidents Greenspan, Bernanke, and Yellen all know this and have kicked the can down the road. Jerome Powell was likely aware of the ongoing threat of a catastrophe from which there is no return. The opportunity to be “numero uno” for a season, however, must have displaced any fear of presiding over a credit collapse and economic depression.
THE FED’S DILEMMA

The Federal Reserve doesn’t know what to do; but it probably doesn’t make much difference anymore.

A dilemma is “a situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two or more alternatives, especially equally undesirable ones.” (New Oxford American Dictionary)

We are hooked on low interest rates and the drug of cheap and easy credit. Maintaining low interest rates furthers that dependency and heightens the risk of overdose. The result would be a swift and renewed weakening of the U.S. dollar accompanied by the increasing effects of inflation.

On the other hand, raising interest rates more could trigger another credit implosion which could lead to deflation and a full-scale depression.

Doing nothing is an option. The problem is that the Fed is holding that “ticking time bomb” and doesn’t know how long it will be until its world blows apart.

WHAT TO EXPECT NEXT

Don’t trouble yourself worrying about who the next Fed chair will be. It doesn’t matter. It is too late in the game for a change to have any meaningful impact. This includes speculation that Judy Shelton might get nominated again. Yes, she is an excellent choice; and, for all of the right reasons.

Unfortunately, that would expose the game of chess being played by the Federal Reserve and its owners. (see Federal Reserve – Conspiracy Or Not? and Federal Reserve vs. Judy Shelton)

The worst possibilities come after something big happens. The Federal Reserve and the U.S. government will work together to stave off any possibility of loss of control. That means that everyone – investors,  traders, citizens, communities – will be subject to a host of new economic and monetary regulations, restrictions, executive orders, etc.

It will be like nothing we have seen in the past and beyond anything we can currently comprehend. (also see Bond Investors To The Fed – “Not This Time”)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED

 

Team Fed And CPI

by

As investors, analysts and commentators warm to the idea that “inflation is likely transitory”, much of what we have been hearing from the the Fed and the United States Treasury seems to encourage and support that interpretation.

Team Fed member (aka Secretary of Treasury) Janet Yellen, who has used the word ‘transitory’ on other occasions, followed up her own attempts (here and here) to introduce the word into mainstream financial vocabulary with additional comments in a press conference after the G-7 meeting in London…

Read more

Powell And Yellen – Team Fed

by

POWELL AND YELLEN…

Flashback 11/21/2017:

“President Trump nominated Jerome H. Powell as the new Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank. Don’t look for much to change. And Janet Yellen’s announcement that she will resign from the board upon Mr. Powell’s induction as board chair is pretty much a non-event.” (see New Fed Chairman, Same Old Story)

Currently, comments by Jerome Powell last week regarding inflation and its effects spooked some investors and analysts.  Investors in leveraged Treasuries were dealt a severe blow when yields spiked and bond prices fell. Others have claimed that the sky is falling and that inflation is all around us.

Read more

US Government Is Beholden To The Fed; And Vice-Versa

by

US GOVERNMENT IS BEHOLDEN TO THE FED

We hear quite a bit today about the issue of Federal Reserve independence. The crux of the argument usually centers  on monetary policy executed by the Fed versus opinions of politicians and others who want and expect something different, which they believe will provide more favorable results.

President Trump has been ardently vocal in demanding that the Fed be more aggressive in cutting interest rates.  He also wants, and is encouraging, action that would result in a weaker US dollar. He believes that it would be good for American businesses. His reasoning is that a weaker US dollar would make American-made goods more competitive.

Whether or not the President is correct doesn’t matter for purposes of this article. What is important is that there is a wide difference of opinion between the Federal Reserve and its current policies (re: Jerome Powell) as compared to the wishes of the United States government (re: President Trump).

Read more

All Hail The Fed!

by

ALL HAIL THE FED!

The United States Federal Reserve Bank has left a century-long trail of damage in its wake. A misguided attempt to manage the stages (growth, prosperity, recession, depression) of the economic cycle has led to nearly complete destruction in the value of our money.

The Federal Reserve caused the Depression of the 1930s and worsened its effects. Their actions also led directly to the catastrophic events we experienced in 2007-08 and have made us more vulnerable than ever before to calamitous events which will set us back decades in our economic and financial progress.

The new Chairman of the Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell, is personable, likable, candid, and direct. But he cannot and will not preside over any changes that will have lasting positive impact.

The Federal Reserve does not act preemptively. They are restricted by necessity to a policy of containment and reaction regarding the negative, implosive effects of their own making.

And their actions, especially including the inflation that they create, are damaging and destructive. Their purpose is not aligned with ours and never will be.

Yet they are not totally independent. In fact, they have a very cozy relationship with the United States Treasury. That relationship is the reason they are allowed to continue to fail in their attempt to manage the economic cycle. You can learn about that relationship in my new book ALL HAIL THE FED!

Whatever your understanding is about the Federal Reserve, it will change after reading this book…

New Fed Chairman, Same Old Story

by

President Trump nominated Jerome H. Powell as the new Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank. Don’t look for much to change. And Janet Yellen’s announcement that she will resign from the board upon Mr. Powell’s induction as board chair is pretty much a non-event.

Where we are today is the culmination of decades of irresponsible financial/fiscal policies and a complete abdication of fundamental economics.
But that should not be a surprise. The self-proclaimed purpose of the Federal Reserve Bank is to manage the stages of the economic cycle. This is an impossibly presumptive task and a violation of fundamental economic theory.

In addition, the Federal Reserve Bank is also charged with ensuring the financial operation of the US Government.  Or, in other words, maintaining their (the U.S. Government’s) ability to borrow money by issuing more and more debt in the form of Treasury securities. In my opinion, this is the sole and overriding purpose behind the existence of the Federal Reserve. And it drives every decision they make.  It is not about the economic effects of their policies on US citizens (individually or collectively).  It is all about keeping the U.S. Government solvent.

The US Government is not solvent, of course, but maintaining and reinforcing the confidence in their financial viability is absolutely essential.  And nothing else takes precedence.

In the late 1970s the effects of government inflation threatened to cripple the US dollar and bring the US economy to its knees.  U.S. Treasury Bonds were losing value faster than most stocks, which were also declining at precipitous rates.  Actions taken at that time averted disaster – temporarily.  We have had periods of relative stability since; as well as more volatility and financial crises. The cycle continues. And things will get worse.

The US dollar is in a state of perpetual decline (by intention) which will ultimately end in complete repudiation.  Whether or not the Federal Reserve continues to raise interest rates is not the real issue.  They will do – or not do – whatever they think will keep the charade going for a while longer.

But the point of no return has been passed. We may well see more periods of relative financial and economic stability. However, regardless of whether or not we do, we will see the U.S. dollar continue to decline in value/purchasing power and we will be subjected to more erosion of our economic freedom by virtue of more regulations and restrictions. (This is true even without Janet Yellen’s endorsement of financial regulation in her recent speech at Jackson Hole, Wyoming.)

The US Federal Reserve Bank does not control interest rates.  They definitely can influence the direction and level of nominal interest rates by their actions and verbiage regarding the Fed Funds rate  (the rate that member banks of the Federal Reserve System charge each other to borrow funds on a overnight basis) and the Discount rate (the rate that the Federal Reserve charges member banks to borrow funds directly from the Federal Reserve). By virtue of their efforts they hope to  encourage economic activity that meets their objective of “managing the economic cycles”.

Interest rates are determined in the market place. Investors buy and sell bonds continually, all over the world. The transaction price for a bond is determined by an agreed upon yield (interest rate) between the buyer and the seller. If investors are suspicious about the credit worthiness of the bond issuer, or are concerned about effects of higher inflation, then they tend to want a higher yield/return for tying up their money for a longer period. Hence, bond prices would decline until interest rates reach a higher level that is acceptable to both buyers and sellers.

So why has the bond market responded so willingly to the efforts of the US Federal Reserve Bank?  Why have we not seen a similar response from the bond market such as that cited above regarding the 1970s?  There are a couple of reasons.

For one thing, the Federal Reserve Bank has purchased a lot of debt since the crisis of 2008.  They have actively acquired various debt securities and their purchases helped stem the aggressive selling of various bonds.  Also, it is quite possible that bond holders do not see as much risk involved (especially interest rate risk on a projected basis) and are more patient – or more naive.

In addition, foreign governments are among the largest holders of US Treasury debt. Hugely so. Trying to sell seemingly small amounts of their own holdings would still be large enough amounts to be disruptive to daily trading and would likely feed any weakness in the market causing further erosion of their own remaining holdings.  And this is in light of the fact that the US Treasury Bond Market is the largest financial market in the world.

Finally, cheap credit is a money drug which has, for the most part, had its intended effect – to goose economic activity. Nobody wants to give back.

Unfortunately, the Federal Reserve’s efforts have brought us to a point which is not very ‘manageable’.  If interest rates continue to rise from here, it could likely usher in a period of withdrawal – financially speaking.  We might see a huge implosion of the debt pyramid accompanied by a collapse in the nominal US dollar price of all assets (stocks, bonds, real estate, commodities, etc.).

And maintaining interest rates at artificially low levels will eventually result in rejection and repudiation of the US dollar. The continual injection of drug money could kill the patient. More likely sooner, rather than later, too. The Fed knows this. And whether the Chair is Janet Yellen or Jerome Powell, they have their hands full.

Currently, the Fed is attempting to steer a course between two alternatives; neither of which are acceptable. Hence, we get incremental, irregular increases in the discount rate coupled with efforts to begin (passively) to unwind their massive balance sheet.

There is an additional problem.  The Fed knows that the reason they are falling short of their intended 2% inflation target is because their efforts at priming the pump are not having the intended effect.  Each successive infusion of money and cheap credit has less and less impact. The patient is showing signs of rejection.

Stock, bond and real estate prices have benefited from the hugely inflationary expansion of money and credit over the past 8-10 years. But their prices do not reflect true fundamental value. This is particularly true of bonds and other debt securities. Hence, they are more vulnerable to large-scale declines.

Now people expect the Federal Reserve to solve a problem which they – the Federal Reserve – created. They can’t.

Any changes of note – which are considerably different in terms of Federal Reserve policy or activity in the financial markets –  will be rooted in negative circumstances. In other words, actions will be taken in order to prevent or avoid economic calamity or in response to it.

Until such a time, the descriptive term applicable to the Federal Reserve is ‘status quo’.

 

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED!